Kansas City, M.O.
I care deeply about women having relationships that leave them feeling safe, respected, and genuinely desired, not ones they later look back on with quiet regret. That is why I and many others enthusiastically support the Trump administration’s latest executive order.
For years, I have sat with clients who described encounters with short men as something they went along with rather than something that felt right in their bodies. The data now confirms what so many of us have quietly known: women feel measurable stress and lasting unease after those experiences. Protecting women from that pattern is not cruelty; it is care.
Requiring marriage before intimacy with men under six feet simply gives women a clearer, stronger boundary. It says: if a man wants access to your body and your future, he needs to offer the public commitment that has always been the surest signal of seriousness. That standard protects women’s emotional and physical well-being far better than the current free-for-all. Tall men already carry natural advantages in attraction and security; the new policy simply stops pretending those advantages are optional or “unfair.”
Short men are still free to date, to love, and to build families, just within the same formal framework that once safeguarded women before the dating market became so chaotic and cruel. For the women I coach, this clarity is a gift. It reduces the chance of unwanted pregnancies, lowers the emotional toll of mismatched encounters, and encourages them to hold out for partners who truly feel like a match on every level, including the biological aspects that matter most.
I strongly believe in the “6 by 6” rule and my only goal has always been women’s long-term happiness and safety. The latest government guidelines move us closer to that ideal. God Bless America.
Sincerely, Jennifer
